$1.$ Compute flow and concentration statistics. There are two different methods for conducting disparate impact analysis in this case. One is to contrast the representation of White employees compared to non$-$white employees as a group. Another is to contrast the difference in representation of White employees compared to specific racial$/$ethnic subgroups $($e$.$g$.,$ White compared to African$-$American$).$ Because the case is being brought specifically on behalf of an African$-$American plaintiff, this is the most important contrast, but Tanglewood would like to see what the data look like for non$-$Whites as a whole as well.

a$)$ Examine the selection ratios for all job categories, and determine whether the evidence points to disparate impact discrimination using the $4/5$th ratio.

b$)$ Examine the concentration data and determine whether the relative proportions of White, non$-$White, and African$-$American employees are similar across job categories, or if there appears to be a concentration of White employees in upper management positions.

$2.$ Describe how Tanglewood can make changes to their recruiting procedures to achieve greater employee diversity in the future based on resources described in Staffing Organizations, Chapter $3.$

$3.$ Describe how Tanglewood can make changes to their promotion and career development procedures to achieve greater employee diversity based on resources described in Staffing Organizations, Chapter $3.$ Focus in particular on the internal recruitment process.