1. Develop IRACs to analyze this case and make a sound and valid argument, stating legal reasoning, along with a final decision.

1a) Greg sues Ned in an effort to obtain title to some land claimed by Ned and located inside the state of Texas. Ned has never been to Texas in his life, has never had any contacts of any kind with the state, and refuses to appear in Texas to defend against Greg's suit. Later, after Greg wins a default judgment against Ned, Ned shows up in Texas to claim that the judgment was invalid because he was totally outside Texas, hence Texas courts had no jurisdiction over him, and for this reason they could not affect his rights to the land. Is Ned right? Why or why not? Be detailed in your response.

2a) Mark, an untenured Assistant Professor of Business Law at a public university, is fired from his job for supposedly misbehaving with students in class. Since the firing took place without any kind of hearing, Mark wants to challenge it on procedural due process grounds. Will Mark's claim succeed? Does Mark's situation require legal due process? Assume that the university did not publicize the reasons for Mark's discharge, and will not tell anyone why he was discharged.