$1.$ In the early $1970$s$,$ Kate Fuller$$opened an ac$$count at Tulip Wholesale$$Florist$,$ Inc., to purchase flowers and florist supplies for her flower shop, called Bountiful Beauty$$Flower Shop, which she operated as a sole proprietor$$ship$.$ In $1983,$ the flower shop was incorporated as Bountiful Beauty Flower Shop, Inc.$$Fuller$$con$$tinued to order supplies from Tulip, as did her son when he began to man$$age the day$-$to$-$day operations of the shop during the $1990$s$.$Tulip$,$ which had no knowledge that Bountiful Beauty$$was now a corporation, sued Fuller$$and her son person$$ally to recover a bal$$ance owing on the Bountiful Beauty$$account $($for purchases made after Bountiful Beauty had incor$$porated$).$ Is the fact that Tulip was never informed of the subse$$quent incorporation of the Bountiful Beauty Shop a sufficient ground for piercing the corporate veil and hold$$ing$$Fuller$$and her son personally liable for the debt?$$Explain$.$