$1.$ Inputs from User

$$ AI System Lifecycle Phase: Identify the current phase of the AI system's lifecycle $($e$.$g$.,$ development, deployment, monitoring$).$

$$ TAI Principle for Testing: Select the Trustworthy AI principle$($s$)$ to be assessed $($e$.$g$.,$ fairness, transparency, robustness$).$

$$ Domain of Application: Define the intended domain or application area for the AI system $($e$.$g$.,$ healthcare, finance$).$

$$ Type of Input Data: Specify the types of input data the AI system uses $($text$,$ images, sensor data, etc.$).$

$$ Type of AI System: Identify the specific type of AI system $($e$.$g$.,$ generative AI$,$ predictive models$).$

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

$2.$ TAI Prompt Library

$$ Risks Identification & Categorization:

o Sources: Gather risks from diverse papers and standards $($e$.$g$.,$ EU AI Act, US NIST frameworks, HLEG guidelines$).$

o Frameworks: Align with existing regulatory frameworks $($e$.$g$.,$ GDPR$,$ DSA, DMA$).$

$$ Keyword Identification: Develop a set of keywords associated with identified risks, facilitating prompt generation.

$$ Prompt Classification:

o General Prompts: Broad prompts applicable across multiple scenarios.

o Adversarial Prompts: Designed to test the AI system$$s resilience against attacks.

o Targeted Prompts: Specific prompts focused on identified weaknesses or concerns.

$$ Prompt Validation:

o Literature$-$Validated Prompts: Incorporate prompts that have been validated in academic or industry research.

o Ongoing Validation: Continuously update and refine prompts based on new research and feedback.

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

$3.$ TAI Assessment Process

$$ Feedback Mechanism:

o Personalized Prompts: The system generates a set of prompts tailored to the user's specific needs and input data.

$$ TAI Measurement Criteria:

o Metrics Definition: Define measurable criteria that align TAI principles with concrete metrics $($e$.$g$.,$ accuracy, fairness$).$

o Regular Updates: Frequently update these criteria to adapt to new standards and research.

o Risk$-$Linked Metrics: Establish a direct link between risks and metrics, enabling quantifiable assessments.

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

$4.$ Usage

$$ Internal Evaluation:

o Prompt Response Evaluation: Users assess their AI systems based on the generated prompts.

o Comparison & Evaluation: Compare and evaluate multiple LLMs or AI systems to gauge overall trustworthiness.

$$ Output Evaluation:

o Trustworthiness Analysis: Evaluate AI outputs based on the TAI criteria, identifying areas of strength and vulnerability.

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

$5.$ Reporting

$$ Summary of Risks:

o Risk Identification: Provide a comprehensive summary of identified risks.

o Potential Improvement Areas: Highlight areas where the AI system can be improved to better align with TAI principles.

$$ TAI Lifecycle Alignment:

o Alignment Reporting: Ensure that the AI system$$s development and deployment stages align with TAI principles throughout the lifecycle.

$$ Mitigation Strategies:

o Actionable Insights: Provide specific, actionable recommendations for mitigating identified risks.

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Visual Scheme Representation $($Overview$)$

$$ Phase A:

$1.$ Identify TAI Risks: Use relevant papers, guidelines $($e$.$g$.,$ HLEG, NIST$)$ to identify risks.

$2.$ Categorize Risks: Align identified risks with TAI principles.

$3.$ Define Prompts: Create prompts that reflect these risks for user assessment.

$$ Phase B:

$1.$ Align with Frameworks: Ensure that identified risks and associated prompts align with regulatory frameworks $($e$.$g$.,$ AI Act, GDPR$).$

$2.$ Utilize TAI Prompt Library: Leverage the prompt library to evaluate AI systems and identify risk areas.

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Legal, Ethical, Robust Framework

$$ EU:

o Legal: Incorporate regulatory frameworks like the AI Act, GDPR$,$ DSA $($Digital Services Act$),$ DMA $($Digital Markets Act$),$ Cybersecurity Act.

o Ethical: Reference ethical guidelines from bodies like HLEG $($High$-$Level Expert Group on AI$)$ and the Council of Europe.

o Robust: Consider robustness standards such as those from NIST $($National Institute of Standards and Technology$)$ and other EU$-$specific frameworks $($e$.$g$.,$ ENISA for cybersecurity$).$

$$ Other Countries:

o Legal: Include relevant country$-$specific laws and regulations.

o Ethical: Use guidelines from organizations like the OECD and UNESCO.

o Robust: Implement frameworks like the NIST Risk Management Framework for assessing robustness.

Flowchart: Trustworthy AI $($TAI$)$ Self$-$Assessment Tool Process

DO THE ANAQLYTICAL PROCESS SUGESST TOTAL CODE FOR FROND END AND SOLUTIONS $,$ I EXPECT SUCCESFUL SUGGESTION AND IMPLEMENTATION