$1.$ Matrix Structure:

$$ Improved Communication: A matrix structure can significantly improve communication across departments by creating cross$-$functional teams. Team members from different departments work together on specific projects, fostering a more collaborative environment where information is shared openly. This can lead to faster decision$-$making and improved problem$-$solving as diverse perspectives are brought to the table.

$$ Enhanced Employee Engagement: While the matrix structure offers some opportunities for collaboration, it may not necessarily lead to a more engaged workforce. Employees might still feel restricted by the hierarchical chain of command, with project managers potentially replicating traditional management styles within their teams.

$$ Increased Agility: The matrix structure can enhance the organization's agility by creating flexible project teams that can respond quickly to changing market conditions or technological advancements. Since these teams have members with the specific expertise needed for the project, they can make decisions and implement solutions without having to go through multiple layers of approval in the traditional hierarchy.

$$ Feasibility of Implementation: Implementing a matrix structure requires careful planning and communication to avoid confusion and potential conflicts. Roles and responsibilities for both project managers and functional managers need to be clearly defined to prevent power struggles. Training for all employees on the new structure and expectations is crucial for a smooth transition.