1. Nevada's interest in preventing or minimizing the commodification and commercialization of sex is a substantial government interest. 2. Nevada's restriction on advertising brothels only in those counties in which prostitution is legal is unconstitutional, because it prevents residents of those counties in which prostitution is illegal from learning the availability of those services in other counties. 3. The restrictions on advertisements promoting the services provided by brothels within counties in which prostitution is legal are not narrowly tailored to achieve the state interest in preventing or minimizing the commodification and commercialization of sexual activities. 4. Nevada's restriction on advertising brothels only in those counties in which prostitution is legal is unconstitutional, because it prohibits political speech and does not promote a compelling government interest in the narrowest way possible. 5. Nevada's ban on brothels' advertising the location, telephone number, or means of transportation to a brothel was no more extensive than necessary to serve state's interest in limiting commodification of sex, because prostitution advertisements were themselves an aspect of commodification harm the state sought to limit