1. Persons who score as high on embarrassability scale blush to a greater degree (greater mean elevation in cheek temperature) during the embarrassment task than persons who score as low on embarrassability scale. Taking into account the results of your analysis of the class data discuss the accuracy of the following hypothesis. Consider as well what percentage of the female subjects are in the high embarrassability group? What percentage of the males are in the high embarrassability group? Does the female group have a higher mean elevation in skin temperature? Discuss [3 marks]

2.Mean elevations in skin conductance levels are correlated to mean elevations in cheek temperature. Taking into account the results of your analysis of the class data discuss the accuracy of the following hypothesis. Consider as well does mean elevation in skin temperature correlate with mean elevation in skin conductance? Is this relationship linear? Are the crosses clustered in one region of the graph, and the circles clustered in another region of the graph? Are the group averages for mean elevation in skin temperature and conductance higher in the high embarrassability group than in the low embarrassability group? Does this comparison correlate with the figure? Discuss. Refer to Page 13 of the Protocol. [3 Marks + 3 Marks for figure

Table 3. Example: High EAR Class data

Group	Gender	Mean Skin Temp Change	Mean Skin Conductance Change	EAR*
High Ear	Female Female Male Female Female Female Female Female Female	-1.098 0.125 0.359 -0.026 -0.873 0.135 0.439 1.067 0.267	1.427 1.316 0.775 0.323 2.799 0.7 8.308 0.67 0.011	21 22 25 26 26 28 30 31 32

Mean SE:

0.0440.216

0.7670.327

26.781.28

Group	Gender	Mean Skin Temp Change	Mean Skin Conductance Change	EAR*
Low Ear	Female Male Male Male Male Female Male Male Female	-0.536 -0.502 -1.304 0.045 0.138 0.597 0.536 0.459 -0.632	0.704 2.908 1.881 0.234 0.432 0.386 0.311 0 0.046	11 13 14 16 17 17 18 18 19
Mean SE:		-0.1330.327	0.7670.327	15.890.89