1 Point D had been skiing since he was four years old, had participated in several skiing competitions, and was generally acknowledged to be a first-class skier. While on vacation at a ski resort, D went skiing, and while executing a turn on a moderate ski run, he lost control, and slid backward into P, breaking her ankle. P sued him for negligence. At trial, P's attorney argued that the jury should be instructed that D must exercise the level of care that would be exercised by "the reasonable expert skier under the same circumstances." Should the instruction be given to the jury? Select the correct response: Yes, because D's knowledge, intelligence, and experience may be considered to establish the standard of care. Yes, because the standard of care varies according to a skier's experience. No, because the jury may never consider a defendant's expertise to establish the standard of care. No, because, at the time of the accident, D was not acting as an expert, only as an ordinary skier, so he should be held to the ordinary standard of care