Question: 1 . The purpose of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ is to compensate for the loss suffered
The purpose of is to compensate for the loss suffered because of
wrongful act of another, and it has always imprisonment as a consequence of negligence.
A Tort & true
B Tort & false
C Law & true
D Law & false
a type of injury where no inquiry was made into the reasons for the
injury or whether the conduct of the injurer was intentional or unintentional, and it is called
By contrast, a type of injury where an
inquiryinvestigation was made to determine whether the injury was caused by the others
fault that in the eyes of the law is unjustifiable because it intentionally or carelessly
disregards the interest of others. From the choices below, please choose the right answer.
A Indirect injury, direct liability, and direct injury.
B Direct injury, strict liability, and indirect injury.
C Indirect injury, strict liability, and direct injury.
D Direct injury, indirect injury, and strict liability.
A manufacturer stored acid in a large container on his property. The container was
accidentally punctured by a visitors truck, and the acid leaked out and damaged to a
neighbouring farmers crops. In the context of strict liability, does the manufacturer liable to
the farmer for the cost of damage to their crops? In the context of modern tort, does the
manufacturer liable? Does the manufacturer have a duty of care? Is the duty of care
foreseeable?
A True, true, true, and true.
B False, true, true, and true.
C False, false, true, and true.
D True, true, false, and false.
refers to an unlawful application of force directly or indirectly upon
another person or their personal belongings, causing bodily injury or offensive contact.
refers to an actual act of force to a mere threat of using force against
someone without their consent. Both are punishable by tort and crime of which crime
depends on the gravity of the offence. From the choices below, please choose the right
answer.
A Trespass and battery
B Trespass and assault
C Battery and assault
D Assault and battery
San Moree, a National Hockey League player of Colorado Avalanche, experienced a
fractured spine and a closed head injury after being hit from behind by Tan Betuz of the
Vancouver Canucks during their final game of the regular NHL season. The physical contact
exceeded the acceptable level of impliedly consented in the sport given that many believe
fighting is part of hockey game. San Moore sued Tan Betuz of tort and crime and vicarious
against Vancouver Canucks. In your own opinion, what is the likely outcome of this case?
A Compensation, crime, and vicarious liability.
B Compensation and crime.
C Compensation and vicarious liability
D Crime and vicarious liability
The remedy of tort is to compensate the victim while the remedy of crime is
imprisonment. All tortious acts have always a consequence of a crime. From the choices
below, please choose the right answer.
A True, true & false.
B False, false & false.
C False, true & false.
D False, true & true.
In the early stages of development of a tort, there is no such thing as indirect injuries,
only direct injuries. Therefore, there is no compensation for loss or damage suffered caused
by indirect injury.
A True & true
B False & false
C False & true
D True & false
refers to and includes such actions as blocking public roads, interfering
with the use of public amenities such as marketplaces or parks, and emitting dangerous in
public places. refers to interference of an occupiers use and enjoyment of
hisher own land from substantial interference directly or indirectly from the activity of
neighbouring property.
A Private nuisance and public nuisance
B Public nuisance and private nuisance
C Civil nuisance and public nuisance
D Civil nuisance and private nuisance
KJ Trucking Co has an unpaved sand and gravel parking lot. The dust that was generated
when trucks moved across the lot created a problem for the neighbouring manufacturer, TM
Lighting. KJ Tucking Co has been in operations for more than six years with an unpaved
roads. TM Lighting sued KJ Trucking for private nuisance and argued that: the
interference was substantial because it went on daily for more than six years; the
unreasonableness in its character to the neighborhood; the sensitivity of TM Lighting
business to airborne dust; and as occupier, they have a right of absolute freedom even
from trivial annoyance. Based on the arguments above, in your own opinion, the court will
likely rule that are valid reasons:
A &
B &
C &
D &
In tort law, the plaintiff must prove to the defendant that the evidence is based on
standard of proof that is beyond reasonable doubt, while in criminal case,
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
