Question: 1. Third party verifcation as an acceptable substantive audit procedure was as a result of which of the following cases? London and General Bank Case
1. Third party verifcation as an acceptable substantive audit procedure was as a result of which of the following cases?
-
London and General Bank Case
-
Royal Bank of Scotland v Bannerman Johnstone Maclay
-
City Equitable Fire Incurance Co
-
Capari v Dickman
2. The subject matter that is referred to in the audit assurance engagement includes:
- financial statements
- accounting standards
- audit evidence
-
2 only
2 only
-
1 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
-
1, 2 and 3
1, 2 and 3
-
1 only
3. Which of the following statements best describes the conceptual framework approach to ethics?
-
a set of rules which must be followed in all circumstances
a set of rules which must be followed in all circumstances
-
a set of principles which the auditor applies at their discretion
a set of principles which the auditor applies at their discretion
-
a set of principles which the auditor applies based on professional judgement
a set of principles which the auditor applies based on professional judgement
-
the conceptual framework is set out in company law
4. The prevention and detection of fraud and errors was clearly outlined as not a part of the auditor's duties and responsibilities in which of the following cases?
-
Kingston Cotton Mills
Kingston Cotton Mills
-
London and General Bank case
London and General Bank case
-
Newton v Birmingham Small Arms Co
Newton v Birmingham Small Arms Co
-
Royal Mail Steam Packet Co
Royal Mail Steam Packet Co
5. The scope of standards on auditing includes compliance with specific laws and regulations. ?
-
True
-
False
6. A member was found guilty of ethical misconduct by failing to respond to the professional clearance requests from another audit firm. This is a breach of which fundamental principle?
-
independence
independence
-
professional competence and due care
professional competence and due care
-
integrity
integrity
-
professional behaviour
7. JP Auditors & Accounting Est. signs an engagement letter before starting the audit of Halifax Hardware because of the following reasons except:
-
this is a documentary evidence of the confirmation of the audit engagement
this is a documentary evidence of the confirmation of the audit engagement
-
it helps to minimise the risk of misunderstanding
it helps to minimise the risk of misunderstanding
-
the terms and conditions of the agreed upon audit engagement are made clear
the terms and conditions of the agreed upon audit engagement are made clear
-
the details of the audit opinion are clearly stated
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
