$1$ Why are projects$/$programmes seen as investments in government reporting rather than PMBOK's definition of temporary endeavors to achieve a specified outcome.

You are to clearly discuss these two terms and justify the term investment and its use by government.

$2$ What is the rationale for changing our monitoring and evaluation system to one that is results based and what benefit can this bring to the evaluation of the stated project's$/$programme$?$

State the Project or programme that you have chosen, saying why you choose it$.$

Discuss the need to change to results based $-$ note discuss requires you to give the facts of$.$

Also discuss the benefit to the evaluation of the chosen project$/$programme$.$ Clearly show the benefit discussing the project$/$programme$.$

$3$ Discuss the relevance of using the logical framework as an evaluation tool for this project$/$programme$.$

Discuss what the logical framework is$,$ give an example of another evaluation tool and show how the logical framework can be used as an evaluation tool for the project$/$progamme referencing the project.

$4$ With reference to the chosen project$/$programme$,$ using the logical framework as a tool for evaluation, identify and discuss for the Project or programme:

one $(1)$ intended impact,

one $(1)$ intended outcome.

three $(3)$ outputs of the programme,

two objectively verifiable indicators of achievement and

two sources and means of verification with respect to outputs and outcomes.

Any relevant risk factors $/$assumptions