11.8

c. Should this project be undertaken? Select If so, should the firm do the mitigation? I. Uhder the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis II. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV without mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. I11. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR with mitigation is greater than its 1RR when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. iv. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since ption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since V. Under the assum c. Should this project be undertaken? Select If so, should the firm do the mitigation? I. Uhder the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis II. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV without mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. I11. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR with mitigation is greater than its 1RR when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. iv. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since ption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since V. Under the assum