1.?Seki agreed that Groupon could sell 18 hot airballoon rides on his Magical Adventures company balloons. He didnot give Groupon permission to use his company name. When it did onits website, Seki sued Groupon for invasion of privacy. The courtof appeals held that Seki had:

Group of answer choices

-?no claim because a only persons, not companies, could sue forinvasion of privacy.

-?no claim because there was a relationship between Seki andGroupon which logically extended to Magical Adventures.

-?a claim for false light invasion of privacy.

-?a claim for invasion of privacy through misappropriation.

-?none of the other choices are correct.

2.Which of the following is not an element needed toshow negligence:

Group of answer choices

-the wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured party

-a duty of care owed to the injured party was breached by an actof the wrongdoer

-the injured party suffered harm from legally carelessconduct

-there is a causal connection between the injured party's harmand the wrongdoer's conduct

-all of the other choices are necessary elements

3.False imprisonment is the unjustified, intentionaldetention of a person. The detention:

Group of answer choices

-must be physical

-must be violent

-need not be physical

-must be verbal

-must be reasonable under the circumstances

4.Absolute privilege grants immunity in situationswhere:

Group of answer choices

-the defendant did not intend to cause harm

-public policy favors complete freedom of speech

-businesses stand to lose money

-all of the specific choices

-none of the other specific choices

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

ANSWER 1 A no claim because a only persons not companies could sue forinvasion of privacy Acts of illegally intercepting or listening in on private ca... View the full answer