2) These four sources differ from eachother based on a few details. The first source, "Intoxication as ground for avoiding contract - 36 A.L.R. 619\" focuses specifically on how being under the influence! intoxicated nullifies any formal contract made whilst one of the parties was too intoxicated in order to understand the consequences of making such contract. The other source Intoxicated person - Restatement (Second) of Contract 16 [1981) does focus specifically on the instancelsl where someone is too intoxicated to properly form a contract, this source also has statutes and codes listed with "" numbered and it goes over other common issues when it comes to the formation of contracts. Essentially the Restatement (Second) lists these ideas in an easy to read manner but does not go into the same depth as say some sort of legal encyclopedia such as Black's. The third source (C.J.S. Contracts 196l differs from the sources since that the article contained with the CJ.5. known as 196 intoxication as affecting capacity to Contract covers the generals to what being intoxicated during contract formation. The major difference for this work is that it includes a footnotes section which provides a list of primary and secondary authority that can be further researched in order to find more on-point authority. The elements of Contract - Effect of Intoxication 25 Wash. Prac., Contract Law and Practice 2:6 [3d ed.) is literature that covers the specifics and details of contract law, as well as conducting analysis on such topic. Its like an encyclopedia dedicated to the practice of contract law which covers over the general topics into more specific sub topics pertaining to contracts. This is a format that the other three sources lack, since they just contain a section about intoxication during contract formation