20 points) This year, Texas passed SB8, which is often referred to as a fetal heartbeat law and bans abortions after 6 weeks. Ignoring the enforcement mechanism in SB8 and simply focusing on the ban after 6 weeks, how would this law have been reviewed under the standard of review established in Roe v. Wade? Please explain how a court would evaluate this type of law under the case law established after Roe, stating the standard of review and what it means (you do not need to go through the full arguments of whether the law is valid or not, but rather focus on the methodology and its specifications)? Please briefly explain whether you believe the differences in review standards would result in different outcomes and why.