3 (15 marks) During a heated argument between two neighbours, Alice and Bob, Alice suddenly collapses and suffers a severe head injury. Bob immediately rushes to Alice's aid, calls emergency services, and tries to administer first aid until help arrives. Unfortunately, Alice passes away before medical assistance can reach her. Subsequently, Bob is charged with manslaughter. At trial, the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence of Bob's actions immediately after Alice's collapse as part of the Res Gestae. Question: Discuss the concept of Res Gestae in evidence law and its relevance to the scenario described above. Evaluate the admissibility of the evidence concerning Bob's actions following Alice's collapse as Res Gestae evidence. Consider the criteria that courts typically use to determine whether evidence falls within the Res Gestae exception to the hearsay rule. Finally, analyse the potential impact of admitting or excluding this evidence on the prosecution's case against Bob. (15 marks)