In this exercise we consider dynamic tables with insertions only (no deletions) using the doubling technique....

Transcribed Image Text:

In this exercise we consider dynamic tables with insertions only (no deletions) using the doubling technique. Can we show that the amortized cost of an insertion is O(1) using the following potential function: (D,) = k, where k is the number of elements in the array? In this exercise we consider dynamic tables with insertions only (no deletions) using the doubling technique. Can we show that the amortized cost of an insertion is O(1) using the following potential function: (D,) = k, where k is the number of elements in the array?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Amortized Analysis The claim that hash tables have O1 expected performance for lookup and insert is based on the assumption that the number of elements stored in the table is comparable to the number ... View the full answer