Question: 370 LOGLINEAR MODELS FOR CONTINGENCY TABLES Table 9.18 Software Output (Based on SAS) for Fitting a Loglinear Model to Table 9.17 Criteria for Assessing Goodness

 370 LOGLINEAR MODELS FOR CONTINGENCY TABLES Table 9.18 Software Output (Based

370 LOGLINEAR MODELS FOR CONTINGENCY TABLES Table 9.18 Software Output (Based on SAS) for Fitting a Loglinear Model to Table 9.17 Criteria for Assessing Goodness of Fit Criterion DF Value Deviance 7 12.3687 Pearson Chi-Square 7 12.1996 e Parameter EI SN SNTF SN'JP TFJP n f j j Analysis of Parameter Estimates Standard LR 95% Confidence Estimate Error Limits 0.3219 0.1360 0.0553 0.5886 0.4237 0.1520 0.1278 0.7242 -1.2202 0.1451 -1.5075 -0.9382 -0.5585 0.1350 -0.8242 -0.2948 DF 1 1 1 1 n Wald Chi- Square 5.60 7.77 70.69 17.12 f 9.3 Refer to the previous exercise. Table 9.18 shows the fit of the model that assumes conditional independence between E/I and T/F and between E/I and J/P but has the other pairwise associations. a. Compare this to the fit of the model containing all the pairwise associations, which has deviance 10.16 with df = 5. What do you conclude? b. Show how to use the limits reported to construct a 95% profile likelihood con- fidence interval for the conditional odds ratio between the S/N and J/P scales. Interpret c. SAS (PROC GENMOD) reports maximized log-likelihood values of 3475.19 for the mutual independence model, 3538.05 for the homogeneous association model, and 3539.58 for the model containing all the three-factor interaction terms. Write the loglinear model for each case, and show that the numbers of model parameters are 11, and 15, so residual df = 11, 5, and 1. d. According to AIC, which model in (c) seems best? Why? 370 LOGLINEAR MODELS FOR CONTINGENCY TABLES Table 9.18 Software Output (Based on SAS) for Fitting a Loglinear Model to Table 9.17 Criteria for Assessing Goodness of Fit Criterion DF Value Deviance 7 12.3687 Pearson Chi-Square 7 12.1996 e Parameter EI SN SNTF SN'JP TFJP n f j j Analysis of Parameter Estimates Standard LR 95% Confidence Estimate Error Limits 0.3219 0.1360 0.0553 0.5886 0.4237 0.1520 0.1278 0.7242 -1.2202 0.1451 -1.5075 -0.9382 -0.5585 0.1350 -0.8242 -0.2948 DF 1 1 1 1 n Wald Chi- Square 5.60 7.77 70.69 17.12 f 9.3 Refer to the previous exercise. Table 9.18 shows the fit of the model that assumes conditional independence between E/I and T/F and between E/I and J/P but has the other pairwise associations. a. Compare this to the fit of the model containing all the pairwise associations, which has deviance 10.16 with df = 5. What do you conclude? b. Show how to use the limits reported to construct a 95% profile likelihood con- fidence interval for the conditional odds ratio between the S/N and J/P scales. Interpret c. SAS (PROC GENMOD) reports maximized log-likelihood values of 3475.19 for the mutual independence model, 3538.05 for the homogeneous association model, and 3539.58 for the model containing all the three-factor interaction terms. Write the loglinear model for each case, and show that the numbers of model parameters are 11, and 15, so residual df = 11, 5, and 1. d. According to AIC, which model in (c) seems best? Why

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!