3.A What is your conclusion by dominance method? (4pt) 3.B Compare the alternatives against a standard using Rule 1 and Rule 2. Summarize your conclusion in a table and state your reason very clearly step by step. (12 pt.) 3.C Compare criteria across alternatives with rank of (2>4>1>3). (9 pt.) **Note: 2.3.1 without minimum standard, 2.3.2 with minimum standard Minimum. Criteria Project1 Project2 Project3 Project4 Standard 1.PW($million): Present worth 75 55 45 45 2.Income Potential index: scale of 1-100) 115 120 135 150 105 3.QFD index: scale of 1-15) 12 15 13 12 60 8 4.Market survey results: Poor(P) Good (G), Very good (VG). Excellent (E) VG G E G