$4,3\mathrm{.}33$ points

In Lamson v$.$ Crater Lake Motors, in which a car sales employee who felt that the sales tactics of the company were unethical and was fired after he refused to cooperate sued the company for wror discharge, the appeals court found that:

Lamson had no case because Crater Lake Motors had no history of racial discrimination

Lamson had no case because his actions were not an important public duty

Lamson had no case because he committed illegal acts while working at the dealership

Lamson had no case because Crater Lake Motors was participating in illegal transactions, but Lamson did not know of them until after the fact

Lamson had no case because he had a history of making false claims in prior suits filed against the company