41. Why analyze precedent transactions? Shouldn't it be enough to analyze comparable companies? Once a comparw becomes target, its price is rely to be bid up because of control premiums, expected synerples and the push pull of the mergers and acquisition marketplace Following procedents is important to that people know the rights and duties under the law. Precedent transactions are important because it is important to know a company history, it has failed in the pastilely to fall in the future Nobody cares about precedent transactions. What people want to know whether a company is environment woke What the recycling programie? Do they wet all their enery from wind and solar? Do they only cars and tricks Question 42 1.6 pts 42. Precedent transactions should be those involving cuisition of company in the came industry as the relatively the same time and relatively recent involving in the same industry as the courer, relatively the samese and really recent involving in the same industry as the target lately the same and relatively recent volving the universe and everything. All precedent transactions are if they are recent