4/28/2025 In Progress NEXT UP: Submit Assignment Attempt 1 Unlimited Attempts Allowed 4/6/2025 Details Make sure to read the detailed instructions and scoring guide (rubric) for Assignment 1: Evaluating Sources for a Historical Topic, which is due this week. You can also find the full instructions and scoring guide in the course guide. To complete your assignment: 1. Review and complete your work in the webtext on page 3.8. 2. Download your assignment. 3. Submit your assignment below. Skills Being Assessed: Problem Solving What is the value of doing this assignment? This assignment gives you an opportunity to practice the skill of problem solving. It will show that you can find and evaluate relevant, reliable, and credible sources. Problem solving is a universal skill and one you will continue to refine as you progress throughout your career. This assignment asks you to use what you've learned in the first three weeks of the course about finding and evaluating sources. Worried about where to start? The good news is that you've already laid the foundation with the webtext activities in Chapters 1 and 2. This assignment will use what you wrote in those activities to help you record your response. Your goal for this assignment is to: Practice your problem solving skill. You will do this by applying what you know about sourcing to evaluate sources on your chosen topic. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is: . Analyze historical records that allow one to determine credibility and validity. View Rubric Week 3 Assignment - Evaluating Sources for a Historical Topic Criteria Ratings Pts Identify four relevant 20 to > 18 pts 18 to > 16 pts 16 to > 14 pts 14 to > 12 pts 12 to >0 pts /20 pts sources (two primary and Exemplary Competent Satisfactory Needs Unacceptable two secondary) from the Identifies four Identifies three Identifies two Improvement Does not identity source list to support the relevant sources relevant sources relevant sources. Identifies primary or main points, (two primary andto support the Support for the primary and secondary two secondary) main points with main points of secondary sources. to support the no errors, evidence may be sources, but main points with lacking or some sources no errors. unclear. were not relevant; or did not meet the minimum number of sources required; support for the