5) (challenge) Consider the two structures drawn below. Because of the Lennard-Jones potential, the bond energy for a configuration of particles will always be negative. The amount of energy it takes to break apart the configuration will always be the amount required to raise the total bond energy to zero. a) b) Using the Pythagorean theorem, determine the distance between next-nearestneighbor bonds in the square conguration. Use this distance and a graph of the Lennard-Jones potential to estimate the amount of energy stored in each of these next-nearest neighbor bonds. Recall that r0 = 1.120. Considering both nearest and next-nearest neighbors, estimate the bond energy for these two 00 structures. Is the distance between next-nearest neighbors the same for both configurations? Report 00 r0 your answer in terms of the well depth, a. How much 0 energy would you have to add to break these structures apart? Based on what you found in b), which structure would you expect to be more stable if both configurations were made of the same kind of particle? If the square atomic structure was made up of atoms B from FNT 1), with 833 = 5 x 1021], and the linear structure was made up of atoms A from FNT 1), with 5AA = 20 x 1021], which structure would be more stable? Calculate the bond energy of the square structure shown to the right using atoms A and B, considering all neighbors as in a). Assume the atoms are the same size, but with potential well-depths as in FNT 1): 5,4,4 = 20 x 10-211,.933 = 5 x 10-21], and 5,\