Question: 5. Ruth V, RN, incorrectly read the physician's order and gave her patient 50 mg. of Demerol instead of 25 mg. The RN is liable

5. Ruth V, RN, incorrectly read the physician's order and gave her patient 50 mg. of Demerol instead of 25 mg. The RN is liable as she violated the rights of drug administration . As action patient needs to be assessed for any unusual symptoms of overdose. The RN needs to address her superior with proper explanations and needs to be given a memo or warning

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer

Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image

Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock

Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!

Ruth V, RN, incorrectly read the physician's order and gave her patient 50 mg. of Demerol instead of 25 mg. The RN is liable as she violated the rights of drug administration . As action patient...

answer the following questions: What are your moral obligations as professionals to prevent such things from happening? What guidance do the professional codes provide (cite specific code sections in...

Sundance HealthCare Systems Patient Family Name First Name Skorzeny, Painted Valley, USA Age Arlene M.. Room No. 58 207 Attending Physician Date Dr. W. B. Ackerman Component Chemistry CMP Sodium...

please read Moore v. Regents of the University of California . Then, please discuss the following topics with respect to this case, answering at least three of the following questions What did the...

Case Study One Monday morning in early 2004 my husband Jerry woke me and said his back was hurting. When the pain became severe we decided to go to the emergency room. At the emergency room, they...

Please read the case study below and answer the following questions with detailed specifics to support your answers. Please upload your Word document to your instructor for grading. A Sudden Pain One...

Page 1 1 of 9 DOCUMENTS WYETH, Petitioner v. DIANA LEVINE No. 06-1249 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 555 U.S. 555; 129 S. Ct. 1187; 173 L. Ed. 2d 51; 2009 U.S. LEXIS 1774; 77 U.S.L.W. 4165; CCH...

Review lecture, Art of Case Briefing, and read SCOTUS's opinion on Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam. After, write a case brief on Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam. Because this is a...

Provide a case brief for the case bellow Case brief Template : CITATION: TABER v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee. Christensen v. Swenson, Wickline v. Cal., 239 Cal. Rptr. 810, 192 Cal....

What is LexisNexis Academic?

You are computing the value of a firm headquartered in an emerging market. Identify the factors unique to an emerging market that need to be evaluated when estimating the cost of equity using the...

E1.2 (LO 2) (Usefulness, Objective of Financial Reporting, Qualitative Characteristics) Indicate whether the following statements about the Conceptual Framework are true or false. If false, provide a...

Make a statement of cashflows in good form. X X M Inbox 2,50 x M Logistics : * Course: ST: X|MyDrive- x B Group 2 Pex Course ID: Cth Moodle X C Get HomeX C Photos Screx Interview X + ....