Question: 6. Having a large enough It to detect a true difference is important. However, I've also mentioned in class that with a large enough 71,


6. Having a large enough It to detect a true difference is important. However, I've also mentioned in class that \"with a large enough 71, a tiny effect size could still be signicant.\" Do you think a bigger sample size is ALWAYS better? Why or why not? You can argue either case here, but try to consider multiple factors in your answer. 13 points! 0 Please replace this with your answer 7. Use your answers from earlier, the following information, and the format from class to interpret the results. 110 points) The sandwiches Dan ordered were on average 14.13 ounces, with a standard deviation of 5.41. The sandwiches Laura ordered were on average 15.13 ounces, with a standard deviation of 6.78. The test-statistic was -1.10. (Use the answer you wrote above to report the teststatistic and degrees of freedom). Cohen's d was 0.55 (as an aside, this is a place where I don't think Cohen's rules of thumb for the size of the effect apply) :1. Please replace this with your answer: We
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
