6. M.(N.) v. A.(A.T.) (2003), 13 B.C.LR. (4th) 75 (C.A.). 2008 BCCA 297 (Canl.IT). N.M. promised to pay the outstanding mortgage on A TA's home if she would leave England and move to Canada to live with him. A.T.A. gave up her job and moved to Canada. N.M. did not keep his promise and eventually evicted A.T.A. from his home. The trial Judge said that promissory estonpel did not apply, as there was no legal relationship between the parties Should the appeal court overturn the trial judge? If A.T.A. relied on N.M.'s promise, to er detriment, should there be an award of damages to ALA? Would there have been a different decision it the case had been heard in a U.S. court? You are a group of young law students analyzing past cases for educational purposes. 1. On the cover sheet, state clearly the full name, and student ID of all people who participated in the assignment. 2. Give a background and summary of the case. (3 points) 3. What is the major type of law involved? (2 point) 4. What are the key legal aspects that the case deals with (5 points) 5. Are there precedents which support or go against the decision made? Are there other precedents which should have been considered. Please provide blue hyper links from www.canlii.org (5 points) 6. Give your analysis of the judgement made. Is it supportable in your group's opinion? Did the judge miss anything you would have considered ? (5 points) Please make sure your answers are in the form of properly written sentences. For question no. 6, make sure you provide your answer in the form of properly written paragraphs. Use the style we have talked about in class, and close with a convincing conclusion. 6. M.(N.) v. A.(A.T.) (2003), 13 B.C.LR. (4th) 75 (C.A.). 2008 BCCA 297 (Canl.IT). N.M. promised to pay the outstanding mortgage on A TA's home if she would leave England and move to Canada to live with him. A.T.A. gave up her job and moved to Canada. N.M. did not keep his promise and eventually evicted A.T.A. from his home. The trial Judge said that promissory estonpel did not apply, as there was no legal relationship between the parties Should the appeal court overturn the trial judge? If A.T.A. relied on N.M.'s promise, to er detriment, should there be an award of damages to ALA? Would there have been a different decision it the case had been heard in a U.S. court? You are a group of young law students analyzing past cases for educational purposes. 1. On the cover sheet, state clearly the full name, and student ID of all people who participated in the assignment. 2. Give a background and summary of the case. (3 points) 3. What is the major type of law involved? (2 point) 4. What are the key legal aspects that the case deals with (5 points) 5. Are there precedents which support or go against the decision made? Are there other precedents which should have been considered. Please provide blue hyper links from www.canlii.org (5 points) 6. Give your analysis of the judgement made. Is it supportable in your group's opinion? Did the judge miss anything you would have considered ? (5 points) Please make sure your answers are in the form of properly written sentences. For question no. 6, make sure you provide your answer in the form of properly written paragraphs. Use the style we have talked about in class, and close with a convincing conclusion