$8)$ Answer questions: $($A and B$)$ thoroughly and succinctly in a well develop paragraph. Plus consider the case study and context provided to choose a stance. A$)$In a well$-$developed paragraph that demonstrates critical thinking skills, please say if the individual believe reverse discrimination is a real issue in modern$-$day workplaces. B$)$Why or why not?

Information: "Reverse discrimination" is a controversial concept for two main reasons. First, protected classes include all races, genders, and sexual orientations, not just those who have been historically discriminated against. Therefore, if a white, heterosexual male were denied a job opportunity based on his race, gender, or sexual orientation, it would be discrimination. The adjective reverse is not needed. Second, empirical data like: Reverse discrimination is a form of unjust discrimination that is not morally objectionable. This chapter argues that affirmative action is not unjust discrimination in a generic sense, as it involves discrimination in a specific sense, such as unjust differential treatment of people due to their socially salient groups. If affirmative action involves discrimination in a generic sense, it is not morally objectionable. Conversely, if all forms of affirmative action involve discrimination in this sense, it is not unjust discrimination, making affirmative action not unjust discrimination, and studies like:

Case study: $$Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.$$ A study in Boston and Chicago found significant racial discrimination in the labor market. Participants were assigned fictitious resumes to help$-$wanted ads in newspapers, with each name assigned either a very African American or very White sounding name. White names received $50\%$ more callbacks for interviews and race affected the benefits of a better resume. Applicants living in better neighborhoods received more callbacks, but this effect did not differ by race. The discrimination was uniform across occupations and industries, with federal contractors and employers who listed 'Equal Opportunity Employer' in their ads also discriminating. The study found little evidence that employers inferred other factors, such as social class, from the names. Discrimination in the workplace is rare, often based on personal, subjective narratives. Anecdotal evidence often involves victims assuming they are the most qualified for a job without considering other candidates' qualifications or skills. In $2009,$ the Supreme Court ruled in the Ricci v$.$ DeStefano case that white and Hispanic firefighters sued New Haven, Connecticut, for discarding promotion exam results due to insufficient minority candidate scores. The Court ruled in favor of firefighters, stating the city's actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The $2023$ case Students for Fair Admissions v$.$ Harvard declared Affirmative Action policies unconstitutional, impacting workplace DEI initiatives at corporations nationwide. The Harvard case has also sparked controversy.