$9.$ As a supervisor, determine a response to deliver to the coding staff as a whole at the next staff meeting regarding levels of productivity.

$10.$ Are there any coders you might want to address separate from the group? If so$,$ who and why?

Quality audit

$11.$ As the supervisor, you need to spot check Coder $1$ for quality, as her productivity level is very high. To do so$,$ launch the EHR of Cheyenne Echohawk, whose chart was coded by Coder $1.$ Click on the Notes tab and review the notes in her EHR to determine if the chart has a detailed Discharge Summary note. A Discharge Summary is required, and Coder $1$ indicated this requirement was met for this EHR. After reviewing the patient record, why do you think that Coder $1$ has a higher productivity level? Explain your answer.

Employee feedback

$12.$ Draft an appropriate email to provide feedback to Coder $3$ regarding productivity level and performance. Make recommendations for improvement, if necessary.

Critical thinking

$13.$ New coding employees are not expected to perform at the same productivity level as seasoned coders. What strategies could you use to keep the average coding productivity the same when a new coder is hired?$\backslash$table$[[$CODER$,$May $3$ Weekly Rate,$\backslash$table$[[$June Monthly$],[$Rate$]],$Analysis$],[1,25\mathrm{.}2$ records$/$day$,33\mathrm{.}32$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[$High productivity coder. June$],[$monthly rate higher $-$ audit$],[$recommended$]]],[2,122\mathrm{.}8$ records$/$day$,122$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[$Average productivity. No real$],[$change in # of records, Possible$],[$knowledge deficits$]]],[3,20\mathrm{.}8$ records$/$day$,23\mathrm{.}08$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[$Increased productivity from May$],[$to June.$]]],[4,43\mathrm{.}4$ records$/$day$,44\mathrm{.}04$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[$Average productivity. $1$ record$],[$difference from May and June,$],[$Possible knowledge deficits$]]],[5,47\mathrm{.}2$ records$/$day$,45\mathrm{.}76$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[$Decreased productivity from May$],[$to June. Possible knowledge$],[$deficits$]]],[6,121\mathrm{.}4$ records$/$day$,\backslash$table$[[120\mathrm{.}36],[$records$/$day$]],\backslash$table$[[$Small decrease in productivity$],[$from May to June. Possible$],[$knowledge deficits$]]]]$