A construction company was sued for harassment when it failed to take seriously the complaints about offensive graffiti scrawled on rented portable toilets. The employer defended by saying $(1)$ employees should be used to such rude and crude behavior. $(2)$ the employer did not own or maintain the equipment, which came with graffiti already on it$.(3)$ it took action after a formal employee complaint, and $(4)$ the graffiti insulted everyone. Will the defenses be successful? $[$Malone v$.$ Foster$-$Wheeler Constructors, $21$ Fed. Appx. $470($Westlaw$)(7$th Cir. $2001)($unpub$.$ opinion$)].$