A department with a highly competent team is left alone by leadership for years. Eventually, the team develops its own norms and resists accountability. According to the Nutt Island Effect, how should this management approach be evaluated?

It's effective$-$autonomous teams always perform better.

It reflects strong trunt in the team, which shoidd be rewarded.

It's acceptable$-$Nigh performers need less oversight.

It's ideal$-$leaders shoud orly intervene when there's a cribic