A. Discuss whether the contract between Company X and Windows Bright is subject to the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code Statute of Frauds. B. Analyze and explain whether the electronic internet contract between Company X and Windows Bright satisfies the "writing" requirements for the Statute of Frauds? If so, how and why? A. The contract between Company X and Windows Bright is subject to the UCC Statute of Frauds. According to Legal Information Institute, in order for a contract to be enforceable, the requirements state that a contract for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more, within a reasonable time having written confirmation, and a contract which does not satisfy the requirements of subsection 1 but which is valid in other respects is enforceable (Cornell Law, n.d.). This means for a contract to be enforced it must be in writing, cost more than $500, and be valid in other respect such as if the good was made specifically for the buyer. Therefore, having been that Company X purchased $800 of window cleaning solution with no written agreement the contract is subject to the UCC Statute of Frauds. B. The use of the electronic contract formed between Company X and Windows Bright will satisfy the "writing" requirements in this case. According to Nolo.com, federal legislation enacted in 2000, known as the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN), made most e-contracts and e-signatures just as legal and enforceable as traditional paper-and-ink contracts and signatures (O'Connell, 2019). Essentially, this allowed electronic contracts to hold