a) Evaluate the Ministers decision. Where did he go wrong? b) Evaluate the recommendation of the committee?

Answer minimum 200 words

X B2BCASE pdf - Adobe Acrobat Reader DC (32-bit! File Edit View Sign Window Help Home Tools B2HCASF2.pdf X Sign In a 0 75% 6 CASES Search 'Fill Form 333 CASE 4 D. Export PDF Edit PDF in lae the AC D Create PDF Kings wever, E Comment icials Combine Files DEX icials El Organize Pages Dany Compress PDF Redact THE EQUATIONS in December 1997, the Minister for Transport, Government of Kerala, issued an order the effect that the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC wouid purchase Leyland od Telco chassis in the ratio of 1:1 superseding the hitherto followed policy of buying the assis of these two companies in the ratio of 2:1. It was decided to buy 1000 bus chassis in wal. The Minister's order also gave this ratio (1:1) retrospective effect from 1994, The Minister for Transport belonged to a small party in the left front coalition government dominated by CPI(M). The political party to which the Transport Minister belonged was characterised by internal fighting and there was opposition to the Minister from within that party. The CPMM) led dominant trade union of KSRTC was very critical of the management of the Corporation The order of the Minister to change the ratio of purchase created a lot of controversy and it was alleged that the Minister had no power to make such a unilateral decision. The State government formed a four member sub-committee to inquire into the case. The Transport Minister tried to justify his decision by arguing that the Telco product would cost 37,623 less and there was problem regarding availability of spare parts of Leyland. The Telco vehicle is generally regarded better for hilly terrains and Leyland for plains. The inquiry committee in its report pointed out that in 1967 and 1994 the decisions regarding ratio of purchase between the products of the two companies were taken after discussions with technical experts and trade unions. No such discussions were held this time The report also pointed out that the purchase decision-making power wasted with the Director Board of the Corporation and that the Minister had no power to issue such an order superseding the Board, The order issued by the Minister to the Managing Director of KSRTC directing to change the ratio from 2:1 to 1:1 was irregular, according to the report of the Committee. The Committee therefore, recommended to nullify the Minister's order and to revert to the old position, i.e., the ratio of 2:1, and the government accepted this recommendation, Questions 2. w O Protect en Fill & Sign Send for comme Convert, edit and e-sign PDF torms & agreements Free 7-Day Trial Type here to search WE ENG 09:44 16/02/2021