A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance level a = 0.05, but...

Transcribed Image Text:

A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance level a = 0.05, but states that the rejection region is left-tailed for F values less than a critical value, which graphically corresponds to Rejection region crit Probability density 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 F-distribution F-statistic 6 CO -5 The correct p-value for this test is 0.062. Given this information, provide a written conclusion regarding the outcome of this test at a significance level a = 0.05 [3 pts] After seeing the results, specifically the p-value of 0.062, your friend suggests changing the significance level to a = 0.1. If you were to do this, explain 1. what conclusion you would now draw 2. why the change in significance level may/may-not have altered the conclusion and the consequences of that 3. whether you think you should follow your friends advice, and why A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance level a = 0.05, but states that the rejection region is left-tailed for F values less than a critical value, which graphically corresponds to Rejection region crit Probability density 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 F-distribution F-statistic 6 CO -5 The correct p-value for this test is 0.062. Given this information, provide a written conclusion regarding the outcome of this test at a significance level a = 0.05 [3 pts] After seeing the results, specifically the p-value of 0.062, your friend suggests changing the significance level to a = 0.1. If you were to do this, explain 1. what conclusion you would now draw 2. why the change in significance level may/may-not have altered the conclusion and the consequences of that 3. whether you think you should follow your friends advice, and why