Question: A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance level a = 0.05, but states that the rejection region is left-tailed for



A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance levela = 0.05, but states that the rejection region is left-tailed forF values less than a critical value, which graphically corresponds to Rejection

A friend runs an ANOVA on this data at a significance level a = 0.05, but states that the rejection region is left-tailed for F values less than a critical value, which graphically corresponds to Rejection region crit Probability density 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 F-distribution F-statistic 6 CO -5 The correct p-value for this test is 0.062. Given this information, provide a written conclusion regarding the outcome of this test at a significance level a = 0.05 [3 pts] After seeing the results, specifically the p-value of 0.062, your friend suggests changing the significance level to a = 0.1. If you were to do this, explain 1. what conclusion you would now draw 2. why the change in significance level may/may-not have altered the conclusion and the consequences of that 3. whether you think you should follow your friends advice, and why

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Mathematics Questions!

Q:

IL