Question: a. liable, because David did not know the risks of sledding. b. liable, because sledding is per se unreasonable. c. not liable, because Davids injuries
| a. | liable, because David did not know the risks of sledding. | |
| b. | liable, because sledding is per se unreasonable. | |
| c. | not liable, because Davids injuries were unforeseeable. | |
| d. | partially liable, because David knew there was a risk but not a per se risk that constitutes a fully actionable claim. | |
| e. | not liable, because David assumed the risks of sledding. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
