A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? I. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation. II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, since the mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. -Select- A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? I. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation. II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, since the mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. -Select-
Expert Answer:
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these finance questions
-
400 KVA 34000/400 V transformer has copper losses is 5000 W and iron losses is 1000 W under nominal load and nominal voltage. A) Calculate the efficiency of the transformer when the nominal load is...
-
What weaknesses are commonly associated with the use of the payback period to evaluate a proposed investment?
-
The simple beam AB shown in the figure has moments 2M0 and M0 acting at the ends. Derive the equation of the deflection curve, and then determine the maximum deflection δmax. Use the...
-
Chemical Boost, Inc. isa manufacturer of TA5 chemical and derivative products. Presented below is select information from Chemical Boosts recent annual cas soy report. The footnotes to the companys...
-
The following are selected 2017 transactions of Pedigo Corporation. Jan. 1 Purchased a small company and recorded goodwill of $150,000. Its useful life is indefinite. May 1 Purchased for $75,000 a...
-
Discuss the advantages of using a customer focused quality system approach, in an organization of your choice, manufacturing or service
-
Suppose C is the curve r(t) = (8t,3t), for 0sts2, and F = (x,6y). Evaluate FTds using the following steps. a. Convert the line integral FTds to an ordinary integral. C b. Evaluate the integral in...
-
A major written understanding between a CPA and his client, in connection with an examination of financial statements, is a client (management) representation letter. \section*{Required:} a. What are...
-
Describe the possible forms of audit reports for a U.S.-based client that is issuing a report for use primarily outside the United States.
-
In his examination of financial statements, an auditor must judge the validity of the audit evidence he obtains. Required: a. In the course of his examination, the auditor asks many questions of...
-
A variety of specific audit procedures for obtaining audit evidence are listed below: 1. Inspected and counted securities on hand. 2. Confirmed inventories stored in public warehouses. 3. Obtained...
-
A healthy diet is becoming increasingly important for consumers, especially women aged 2535. As a result, they are taking active steps to ensure they are eating healthy but are also looking for other...
-
The dataset lowbwt contains information recorded for 100 low birth weight infants born in two teaching hospitals in Boston. Measurements of systolic blood pressure are saved under the variable name...
-
1A. If the researcher is concerned about the number of variables, the nature of the analysis, and completion rates, then, he/she is at which stage of the sampling design process (Figure 11.1 in the...
-
The vertices in the graph below are grain elevators, some of which can be connected by chutes to neighboring elevators, for the purpose of shifting grain from one location to another. The edges are...
-
An alternative algorithm for finding the shortest path from the root \(v_{0}\) to each vertex \(v\) in a directed graph, called Dijkstra's algorithm, is as follows. Initialize the cost \(C(v)\) of a...
-
Use Dijkstra's algorithm (see Exercise 14) to list shortest paths to all vertices \(v_{1}, \ldots, v_{7}\) in the graph of Exercise 11 Do this by hand, rather than with Mathematica.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App