Question: A NPPA your company filed describes a device for processing specialty foods. The examiner identifies a prior art reference that describes a similar device, but
A NPPA your company filed describes a device for processing specialty foods. The examiner identifies a prior art reference that describes a similar device, but only described being used for simple foods; not for specialty foods that are significantly more complex. The examiner rejects the claims of the NPPA. What is the likely basis for the rejection? Be specific. What argument could be used, if applicable, to reverse the rejection?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
