A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no effect in implementing self-efficacy training in improving of the field performances. In measurement of players errors in a game taken in 4 different programs in a group of twelve players (N=12).The means and standard deviations of the sample at each condition were: (1) Very Casual (M = 4.0, SD = 1.054), 2) Casual (M = 7.20, SD = 2.251), 3) Semiformal (M = 8.00, SD = 1.826), 4) Formal (M = 3.80, SD = 1.317). See Table 1.

The result of the ANOVA indicated a significant effect of self-efficacy in improving field performance, Wilks Lambda = .088, F (3, 10) = 24.133, P

Follow-up comparison indicated that each pairwise comparison difference was significant p<.05. there was significant improvement in performance overtime with increase self-efficacy.>

Please submit the tables below in narrative form.

Descriptives Statistic Std. Error very casual Mean 4.00 333 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 3.25 for Mean Upper Bound 4.75 5% Trimmed Mean 4.06 Median 4.00 Variance 1.111 Std. Deviation 1.054 Minimum 2 Maximum 5 Range 3 Interquartile Range 2 Skewness .712 687 Kurtosis -.450 1.334 casual Mean 7.20 .712 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 5.59 for Mean Upper Bound 8.81 5% Trimmed Mean 7.22 Median 7.00 Variance 5.067 Std. Deviation 2.251 Minimum 3 Maximum 11 Range 8 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness -.237 687 Kurtosis 478 1.334 semiformal Mean 8.00 577 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 6.69 for Mean Upper Bound 9.31 5% Trimmed Mean 8.00 Median 8.00 Variance 3.333 Std. Deviation 1.826 Minimum 5 Maximum 11 Range 6 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness 000 687 Kurtosis -.450 1.334 formal Mean 3.80 416 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound 2.86 for Mean Upper Bound 4.74 5% Trimmed Mean 3.78 Median 4.00 Variance 1.733 Std. Deviation 1.317 Minimum 2 Maximum 6 Range 4 Interquartile Range 2 Skewness 088 687 Kurtosis -.751 1.334Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig Statistic df Sig very casual .229 10 .148 .859 10 .074 casual .165 10 .200 .976 10 .941 semiformal 108 10 .200 984 10 982 formal .160 10 200 .942 10 575 * This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction