A$.$ retwrned home from work$),$ yet appearing $($accessible$)$ nationally, including Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio as well as each of the other $47$ states and beyond. That said, Naomi, who possesses an awfinl sense of direction, often finds herself making a wrong turn and ending up lost in various places, in western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, and the "left finger" West Virginia.

Marcus wants to file a lawsuit against Naomi as well as her business for false$-$advertising. He wants to sue in an Ohio state conrt because he loves the Browns and hates the "Stillers" and adores the Buckeyes and despises the Mountaineers. In determining whether the state court in Ohio has jurisdiction in this case, the issue is whether Naomi and her business, through advertisement, have:

Maintained a significant and continuous commercial cyber presence in Ohio for a reasonable period of time specifically targeted towards consumers in the same demographic $($age$,$ gender, income, etc.$)$ as Marcus.

Enfligged in sufficient business activities in Ohio thereby personal availing herself and her business to that form state.

Falsely claimed in advertisement to be domiciled in Ohio or to operate a business in Ohio.

Solicited particular individuals and$/$or companies by$,$ for example, emailing advertisements to them directly, in addition to$,$ or in lieu of$,$ soliciting virtual business in Ohio generally. $$

The second and fourth answer choices above.