$($a$)$: Use a relevant diagrammatic model from Core Economics to discuss whether the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan$$s $2019$ decision reported in Dawn Newspaper $($SC resets private schools fees to Jan $2017$ rates; subjects increases to regulatory approval$)$ about the fee setting powers of private schools is likely to harm or help realize the goals of Pareto and social efficiency maximization $($elimination of dead weight losses$)?$ Discuss potential risks associated with the judgment that may compromise the goal of social efficiency maximization.

NOTE: While labelling the relevant diagram or diagrams please note that the relevant actors in Q $2$ are private schools and households who are looking to send their children to these schools.

$($b$)$: Can the Honorable Supreme Court$$s $2019$ decision do better in terms of social efficiency maximization $($elimination of deadweight loss$)$ than free market price setting if private schools are able to price discriminate? Explain with the help of a relevant diagrammatic model.

$($c$)$: Use a relevant diagrammatic model from Core Economics to model the social welfare consequences of Justice Arab$$s description in the $2019$ SC Judgment $($see his additional note reported in Dawn: SC resets private schools fees to Jan $2017$ rates; subjects increases to regulatory approval$)$ of the evolution of the schooling market in Pakistan? What implication does Justice Arab$$s argument have for public policy.