A very general description of the facts is as follows:  McDonald's fired its CEO in 2019 due to his "inappropriate personal relationship with a McDonald's employee in violation of corporate policy."  The following year's proxy statement reported that he had been terminated "without cause" and described his termination arrangements.  

The SEC went after both the CEO and the company. The CEO was targeted because, among other things, he withheld material information from the company.  Ultimately, the company was able to claw back more than $100 million of compensation from the CEO, who has also been barred for five years from serving as a director or officer of a public company and was required to pay fines of more than $400,000 to the SEC.

Interestingly, the SEC sanctioned Mcdonald's for failing to properly disclose the nature of the CEO's termination and the bases on which his severance compensation was determined.  We've all seen proxy statement after proxy statement explaining that the CEO (or another executive) was terminated without cause and received extensive severance pay.  The SEC message here seems to be that when someone is terminated for engaging in bad behavior - even if it doesn't constitute cause under his/her employment agreement, the company has to come clean.  Such disclosures might have the beneficial effect of reducing the level of "pay for failure" severance packages that failed executives have often received.  McDonald's avoided any serious penalties due to its cooperation with the SEC investigation, at least for now. 

The Board of Directors of McDonald's has hired you as an independent Risk Management Consultant to evaluate the SEC Order and current operations and make recommendations for improvement.  The goal is to advise McDonald's on how to address the current issues and mitigate SEC scrutiny in the future. 

• Put together a report in which you analyze the strengths and weaknesses of McDonald's current ERM Program/efforts and make suggestions for an action plan to address the SEC's concerns going forward.
• Also point out where you are missing information or additional investigations may be warranted in the report.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Report on McDonalds ERM Program Evaluation and SEC Concerns Mitigation Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide an analysis of McDonalds current Enterprise Risk Management ERM program in ... View the full answer