About the law case Leota v Parcel Express Ltd

please help to analyse according to the following

1. What factors affected Mr Leota's understanding of his relationship with Parcel Express Ltd?

2. What were the tax arrangements between the parties?

3. How did the relationship between Mr Leota and Parcel Express Ltd come to an end?

4. How did the Employment Court in Leota deal with the previous precedent from the Court of Appeal in TNT v Cunningham?

5. What factors are relevant to determine the real nature of the relationship (see paras 36 & 38)?

6. What did Chief Judge Inglis find in relation to the question of whether Mr Leota was an employee or independent contractor?

7. At paras 44 to 47, what did the court hold in relation to discussion of the relevance of control from previous case precedents?

8. What was the relevance of industry practice?

9. What was held in relation to the fundamental (economic reality) test?