According to PPM$,$ the state statute violates the U$.$S$.$ Constitution because the state statute does not have an exception to allow abortions after the fetus has become viable in cases of rape or incest. In regard to that specific claim by PPM$,$ what is the federal court likely to hold?

The court is likely to hold that the state statute is constitutional, because the U$.$S$.$ Constitution does not require an exception to allow abortion after viability in cases of rape or incest

The court is likely to hold that the state statute is unconstitutional, because the U$.$S$.$ Constitution requires an exception to allow abortion after viability in cases of rape

The court is likely to hold that the state statute is unconstitutional, because the U$.$S$.$ Constitution requires an exception to allow abortion after viability in cases of incest

None of the above