According to Shaffer, the basic assumptions of Therapeutic Jurisprudence include: Law as a Therapeutic Agent: The law can act as a therapeutic agent, meaning that legal rules, procedures, and the roles of legal actors (like judges and lawyers) can have therapeutic or anti-therapeutic consequences. Focus on Well-being: TJ emphasizes the importance of considering the well-being of individuals involved in the legal process. This includes the psychological and emotional impact of legal proceedings and outcomes. Interdisciplinary Approach: TJ encourages the integration of insights from psychology, psychiatry, criminology, social work, and other disciplines to understand and improve the therapeutic outcomes of legal processes. Holistic Perspective: It advocates for a holistic view of legal issues, considering the broader social, psychological, and emotional contexts of the individuals involved. Empirical Research: TJ relies on empirical research to understand the effects of the law and to develop evidence-based practices that enhance the therapeutic potential of legal processes. Reform-Oriented: TJ is reform-oriented, seeking to change legal rules, procedures, and practices to enhance their therapeutic potential and minimize their anti-therapeutic effects. By focusing on these assumptions, Therapeutic Jurisprudence aims to create a more humane and effective legal system that promotes the well-being of all participants