You are part of an accounting consulting team that has been engaged to help ABC Company consider
Question:
You are part of an accounting consulting team that has been engaged to help ABC Company consider its financial accounting choices for their defined benefit pension plan. You have been given job comparing the corridor method amortization of accumulated other comprehensive income gains and losses vs. expensing all unexpected returns and actuarial changes in the period in which they occur, the two most extreme alternatives. After looking at these alternatives, the company will consider its choices further.
The five years of data[1] that you will use are the following:
To focus the comparisons on the issues involved in this accounting method choice, you will use the following simplifying assumptions:
Assumptions
· Beginning Balance AOCI - Net Gains and Losses $0
· Service Lives of All Pension Participants (in each of the five years modelled) 20 years
· Beginning Balance AOCI – Prior Service Cost $2892
· Average Service Lives of Prior Service Cost Participants in 20x1 10 years
· Assume that the prior service cost estimate is accurate over the next five years, so average service lives of prior service cost participants declines to 9 years in 20x2, 8 years in 20x3, etc.
Deliverables
1. An Excel workbook that accurately calculates pension cost, and the related balance sheet accounts of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income – Prior Service Cost (AOCI-PSC), Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income – Net Gains & Losses (AOCI-G&L), Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO), and Plan Assets at Fair Value (PA-FV) for both alternatives for five years.
A written summary of your work that explains how the alternatives differ from each other, including a chart that provides data visualization of the differences you found. Provide the company with a summary of the advantages of each alternative.
Auditing a business risk appraoch
ISBN: 978-0324375589
6th Edition
Authors: larry e. rittenberg, bradley j. schwieger, karla m. johnston