Activity: Module $10-$ Andrew Morton

Question $1(1$ point$)$

Saved

Listen

In paragraph $3,$ Of the section entitled; "THE BROMINE PENTAFLUORIDE SHIPMENT", $...$it states that a declaration of dangerous goods did not accompany the bill $($of lading$)...$ This statement is a mistake because

Question $1$ options:

Marine shipments don't require a separate dangerous goods declaration, only that the proper tdg information is on the bill

Actually, this statement is not a mistake, a multimodal dangerous goods form with shippers declaration is required.

Andrew would not receive an original of the bill of lading; only the shipper gets the original and the carrier gets copies

Since it was an intermodal shipment no identification of dangerous goods is required under TDGR

Question $2(1$ point$)$

Listen

Assuming that FOB $($port of departure$)$ is the Incoterm used, what would be a the most advisable incoterm to use to prevent liability on behalf of the college?

Question $2$ options:

FCA Schenker Whse Shanghai $($Incoterms $2020)$ because our agent would become the shipper and would do it right

DDU Central Ontario University$($Incoterms $2020)-$ because the shipper would be responsible up until they unloaded the cargo

CIP Freight Terminal Toronto $($Incoterms $2020)-$ because all risk insurance covers damage

CIF Port of Vancouver $($Incoterms $2020)-$ because all risk insurance covers liability for marine shipments

Question $3(1$ point$)$

Listen

The sales contract for the dangerous goods stipulated that they be shipped "FOB destination, freight prepaid". Statements like "FOB destination" and "FOB origin" are common and are:

Question $3$ options:

a proper use of Incoterms $2020$

an improper use of incoterms $2020$ because FOB is a marine term and it must state the port of departure as the named place

not Incoterms, they expressions widely used from the American UCC $($Uniform Commercial Code$)$ for domestic contracts

not Incoterms, they are contract terms used in the UN CISG $($convention for contracts on the International sale of goods

Question $4(1$ point$)$

Listen

If the Shipper is the only one who has access to the goods and is the only one who has the ability to label, package and document the goods, can the Central Ontario University be held responsible for damages?

Question $4$ options:

No the shipper is responsible for compliance and only they are responsible.

No$,$ the importer cannot be held responsible for the actions of others that are outside of their control

Yes, under TDGR act Sec. $5,"$no person shall $...$import dangerous goods unless..."

Yes, TDGR $6\mathrm{.}1$ States: persons handling dangerous goods need to be trained or supervised in accordance...

Question $5(1$ point$)$

Listen

Who were the parties who acted irresponsibly in this case?

Question $5$ options:

Peter Goris who abused the low value purchasing process for purchases of less than $$1000\mathrm{.}00$

Sheryl Henderson of Transport Canada for holding up the container, for holding Andrew responsible for goods that were not his responsibility and for causing demmurrage charges for Central Ontario Univ.

Haiyu Zhao for not properly complying with the international and Canadian regs as promised and lying about it$.$

Andew Morton for not taking steps to remedy the situation immediately

The $21$ other consignees including Jason Kohl who putting goods at risk and possibly delivering them late to Wal$-$Mart, losing their business