Actor Kevin Costner was a $90\%$ limited partner in a restaurant in Summerland. As part of

this limited partnership $($LP$),$ the restaurant owned a parcel of property. The other two

limited partners who owned the remaining $10\%$ in the limited partnership sued Costner to

dissolve the partnership and sell the property. Can the two limited partners force Costner

to sell the property?

No$,$ because the partnership owns the property, not the individual partners

Yes, because there are two limited partners who want to dissolve the partnership, giving them a

majority of the voting interests in the LP

Yes, because the limited partners can claim they are being oppressed by the majority owner

No$,$ because Costner is the majority owner of the partnership