Add the following components to the assignment below: (1) Body paragraphs, (2) Counterargument, (3) Conclusion

- References are already provided.

Body Paragraphs:

• At least three paragraphs
• Each body paragraph should address one of the justifications of the thesis statement's position.

Counterargument:

• Roughly six to seven sentences
• Introduce an argument that opposes the argument made in the thesis statement and then refute it

Conclusion:

• Roughly six sentences
• Bring the paper to a close by emphasizing the importance of the issue and the controversy and answer the 'so what?' question.

Title: Evaluating the Long-Term Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices for Juveniles

Compared to Traditional Incarceration.

Introduction: This article critically examines the limitations of evidence-based practices (EBPs) like CBT in correctional settings. The authors argue that EBPs often fail to account for the complex and diverse needs of offenders and the realities of correctional environments. They highlight challenges such as implementation fidelity, lack of cultural

sensitivity, and potential for re-traumatization. This article offers valuable critiques of EBPs, which can be used to acknowledge the complexities and potential limitations of treatment interventions for offenders.

Purpose: Traditional incarceration of juvenile offenders has been critiqued for its

ineffectiveness in reducing recidivism and its potential to cause further harm. Restorative justice

practices, which prioritize victim-offender mediation and community accountability, are

increasingly seen as potential alternatives. However, concerns exist about their effectiveness in

addressing serious offenses and ensuring public safety. This research is important because it

contributes to the ongoing debate about effective juvenile justice practices. By comparing the

long-term outcomes of restorative justice and incarceration, the study can provide valuable

insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to implement evidence-based interventions

that prioritize rehabilitation and public safety.

Thesis Statement: While both traditional incarceration and restorative justice

practices offer potential benefits for juvenile offenders, a comprehensive evaluation of their

long-term effectiveness, considering recidivism rates, victim satisfaction, and offender

rehabilitation, suggests that restorative justice practices demonstrably reduce recidivism and

promote positive outcomes for all stakeholders compared to traditional incarceration.

References: Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, K. (2011). Meta-analysis of Long-Term Outcomes of

Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Criminal Offenders. Criminology & Public Policy,

10(4), 769-809.

Moffatt, K & Rose, D. (2020). Limitations of Evidence-Based Practices in Correctional

Settings: A Critical Review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative

Criminology, 64(8), 1006-1029.

ADD THIS INFORMATION TO THE PAPER ABOVE

Body Paragraphs:

• At least three paragraphs
• Each body paragraph should address one of the justifications of the thesis statement's position.

Counterargument:

• Roughly six to seven sentences
• Introduce an argument that opposes the argument made in the thesis statement and then refute it

Conclusion:

• Roughly six sentences
• Bring the paper to a close by emphasizing the importance of the issue and the controversy and answer the 'so what?' question.