After reviewing the article write a $1-2$ page paper and discuss the major points:

"Turn off e$-$mail and do some work."

Intel has become the latest in an increasingly long line of companies to launch a so$-$called $\text{'}$no e$-$mail day'. On Fridays, $150$ of its engineers revert to more old$-$fashioned means of communication. In actual fact e$-$mail isn't strictly forbidden but engineers are encouraged to talk to each other face to face or pick up the phone rather than rely on e$-$mail.

In Intel's case the push to look again at the culture of e$-$mail followed a comment from chief executive Paul Otellini criticising engineers "who sit two cubicles apart sending an e$-$mail rather than get up and talk".

US experiments

The idea of a no e$-$mail day is not a new one in the US$,$ where companies have been reaping the benefits of shutting down their inboxes for one day of the week.

Firms such as US Cellular and Deloitte and Touche have been experimenting with e$-$mail for some time.

Last year, fulfilment firm PBD launched a no e$-$mail Friday, when chief executive Scott Dockter suspected that over$-$dependence on e$-$mail was damaging productivity.

Four months later the company felt the trial had been a resounding success, with better teamwork, happier customers and quicker problem solving.

Email stress

Woman looking stressed

Some people get stressed by e$-$mails

According to US research firm The Radicati Group, individual workers sent an average of $37$ e$-$mails a day in $2006$ with predictions this will rise to $47$ by the end of this year.

Another study conducted by researchers at the Universities of Glasgow and Paisley found that one third of users felt stressed by the heavy volume of e$-$mail they had to deal with.

When e$-$mail behaviour was tracked it is was found that many were checking their inbox as often as $30$ to $40$ times per hour.

"There was a mismatch between how often people thought they looked at their inbox and how often they actually did it$,"$ said Mario Hare, a lecturer at the University of Paisley.

He also found that people were setting their own rules when it came to dealing with e$-$mail.

"Some people had a very relaxed attitude to it while others felt they had to respond immediately to every e$-$mail," he said.

He believes that no e$-$mail days can be useful particularly among workers who need to concentrate for long periods of time.

With colleagues, he is working on some add$-$ons to e$-$mail clients that could give power back to recipients. It includes providing a time for when a reply is expected as well as introducing a ranking system for different messages.

Last Updated: Friday, $19$ October $2007,07$:$08$ GMT $08$:$08$ UK

E$-$mail this to a friend Printable version

Turn off e$-$mail and do some work

By Jane Wakefield

Technology reporter, BBC News

With inboxes bulging with messages and many workers dreading the daily deluge of e$-$mail, some companies are taking drastic action.

Paul Otellini, Intel chief executive

Paul Otellini urged his engineers to talk more

Intel has become the latest in an increasingly long line of companies to launch a so$-$called $\text{'}$no e$-$mail day'.

On Fridays, $150$ of its engineers revert to more old$-$fashioned means of communication.

In actual fact e$-$mail isn't strictly forbidden but engineers are encouraged to talk to each other face to face or pick up the phone rather than rely on e$-$mail.

In Intel's case the push to look again at the culture of e$-$mail followed a comment from chief executive Paul Otellini criticising engineers "who sit two cubicles apart sending an e$-$mail rather than get up and talk".

US experiments

The idea of a no e$-$mail day is not a new one in the US$,$ where companies have been reaping the benefits of shutting down their inboxes for one day of the week.

Firms such as US Cellular and Deloitte and Touche have been experimenting with e$-$mail for some time.

Last year, fulfilment firm PBD launched a no e$-$mail Friday, when chief executive Scott Dockter suspected that over$-$dependence on e$-$mail was damaging productivity.

Four months later the company felt the trial had been a resounding success, with better teamwork, happier customers and quicker problem solving.

Email stress

Woman looking stressed

Some people get stressed by e$-$mails

According to US research firm The Radicati Group, individual workers sent an average of $37$ e$-$mails a day in $2006$ with predictions this will rise to $47$ by the end of this year.

Another study conducted by researchers at the Universities of Glasgow and Paisley found that one third of users felt stressed by the heavy volume of e$-$mail they had to deal with.

When e$-$mail behaviour was tracked it is was found that many were checking their inbox as often as $30$ to $40$ times per hour.

"There was a mismatch between how often people thought they looked at their inbox and how often they actually did it$,"$ said Mario Hare, a lecturer at the University of Paisley.

He also found that people were setting their own rules when it came to dealing with e$-$mail.