After reviewing the Chapter $14$ case study, Wells v$.$ Coleman, please outline and analyze the case per the IRAC structure $($following the same format as Discussion $1).$

In addition, please answer the following questions as found in your textbook:

List the factors that were mitigated against and those that worked to establish the claim of undue influence.

Why is access to third parties an important part of undue influence determinations?

How do the activities of the individual during the time of the conveyance affect decisions on undue influence?

Last, provide your perspective on the case based on the following prompt:

This case hinges on the claim of "undue influence" in the counterclaim of Coleman. Part of Coleman's claim is that this influence stemmed from his relationship with Wells, among other influences. Do you believe that the judge recognized the limitations of Coleman's claim of undue influence correctly?