All students need to complete this assignment, by submitting a 1-2 paragraph response comprised of at least 3 - 5 sentences, along with a link to the article you selected. Also, each of you will need to respond thoughtfully (at least 24 sentences) to at least one other students post. Your answers to the two questions will be worth 4 points each, your response to another classmate's post worth 2 points. This week you learned about strict products liability, which is a doctrine that allows people to sue manufacturers, selfers or distributors of products for injuries that they suffer as a result As defects in those products. As you read, a "defect" could be a manufacturing defect, a defect in the design of the product, or a defect in the packaging of the product and warnings that are or aren't included with the product. For this week's discussion, I'd like to know your opinions about whether you think it's fair that manufacturers, sellers and distributors are held strictly liable. Answer each of the following questions, and respond thoughtfully to at least one other classmate's post. 1. Should manufacturers, sellers and distributors be held strictly liable for injuries resulting from use of their products? Why or why not? 2. If you think they should not be held strictly liable, how do you think we as a society should require pay for injuries caused by products? The consumer? Taxpayers? Other parties? Explain why